<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Why of Apple&#8217;s Bootcamp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/</link>
	<description>News and views from a Software Architect and Web Entrepreneur on Java, PHP and Web 2.0 Technologies.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 25 Oct 2010 18:44:23 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Topolinux</title>
		<link>http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-517080</link>
		<dc:creator>Topolinux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2009 07:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-517080</guid>
		<description>I'll tell you why I like the "Why Apple's Bootcamp".
I trashed three laptops in the past three years, each of them paid quite 1600€, each of them a masterpiece of engineering mistakes. I work with three softwares paid a total of 2800€. So, what am I concerned to do?
Should I buy another -e.g.- HP laptop which will die next year, bundled with Vista OS that DOES NOT SUPPORTS my 2800€ software, or should I try the "Apple Way", buying a RELIABLE machine on which I will be able to run my expensive software without being forced to put it in the trash?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ll tell you why I like the &#8220;Why Apple&#8217;s Bootcamp&#8221;.<br />
I trashed three laptops in the past three years, each of them paid quite 1600€, each of them a masterpiece of engineering mistakes. I work with three softwares paid a total of 2800€. So, what am I concerned to do?<br />
Should I buy another -e.g.- HP laptop which will die next year, bundled with Vista OS that DOES NOT SUPPORTS my 2800€ software, or should I try the &#8220;Apple Way&#8221;, buying a RELIABLE machine on which I will be able to run my expensive software without being forced to put it in the trash?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angsuman Chakraborty</title>
		<link>http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8855</link>
		<dc:creator>Angsuman Chakraborty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:32:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8855</guid>
		<description>That would be my impetus to finally swwitch to Mac :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That would be my impetus to finally swwitch to Mac <img src='http://tech.gaeatimes.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: George Lien</title>
		<link>http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8853</link>
		<dc:creator>George Lien</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 13:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8853</guid>
		<description>"I think Apple should actually promote / develop thin windows emulator to natively run windows applications with Mac finesse."

I think your wish might just come true in the next version of Mac OS X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;I think Apple should actually promote / develop thin windows emulator to natively run windows applications with Mac finesse.&#8221;</p>
<p>I think your wish might just come true in the next version of Mac OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Barleycorn</title>
		<link>http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8838</link>
		<dc:creator>John Barleycorn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 21:47:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8838</guid>
		<description>Do a little research, and you will find that this beta is only a first step. The next iteration of OS X due out this fall will include full virtualization, which means you will be able to run windows programs inside of Mac OS X.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do a little research, and you will find that this beta is only a first step. The next iteration of OS X due out this fall will include full virtualization, which means you will be able to run windows programs inside of Mac OS X.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Javier</title>
		<link>http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8831</link>
		<dc:creator>Javier</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 19:09:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8831</guid>
		<description>Boot Camp won't work on PowerPC chips. Apple has produced a reason for PowerMac owners to upgrade to Macintels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Boot Camp won&#8217;t work on PowerPC chips. Apple has produced a reason for PowerMac owners to upgrade to Macintels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Angsuman Chakraborty</title>
		<link>http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8830</link>
		<dc:creator>Angsuman Chakraborty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 17:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8830</guid>
		<description>True. But there were several emulators available for quite some time. AFAIK Apple never officially approved / blessed them. Apple could easily have adopted one of them and bundled with their machine as they are doing now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>True. But there were several emulators available for quite some time. AFAIK Apple never officially approved / blessed them. Apple could easily have adopted one of them and bundled with their machine as they are doing now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James (aka MacManX)</title>
		<link>http://tech.gaeatimes.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8827</link>
		<dc:creator>James (aka MacManX)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2006 16:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.taragana.com/index.php/archive/the-why-of-bootcamp/#comment-8827</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;Why did Apple, after all these years, finally decide to support Windows on their machines?&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Because Apple finally added Intel-based processors to their Macs, which made the process of running Windows on Mac hardware far more simple than it would have been otherwise.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>Why did Apple, after all these years, finally decide to support Windows on their machines?</p></blockquote>
<p>Because Apple finally added Intel-based processors to their Macs, which made the process of running Windows on Mac hardware far more simple than it would have been otherwise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

