Free But Costly - The Open Source Trap

By Angsuman Chakraborty, Gaea News Network
Thursday, February 9, 2006

The title is inspired by Dr. Richard Stallman’s article - Free But Shackled - The Java Trap.

Free as in open source software often doesn’t translate to free for corporations or even individuals. Yakov Fein discusses the Open Source Gotcha - “If you think that selecting an open source software will allow you to use it for free forever? Think again. “.

Yakov discusses about the possibility of future versions of open source software like JBoss being non-free after acquisition. He touches upon “free” open source Jive which suddenly became $8500 per server. The key point is what is free and in open source may cease to become so with future versions, which may be released with commercial licenses. I know scores of such products which were free in dotcom era but are now sold for hefty sum.

BTW: Sometimes however the open source community may step-in and fork out the last open source version and develop new releases from it as has happened with Mambo. As a corporation you cannot rely on that happening. If you truly want to continue with the product you may either have to pay-up or devote resources for at least bug-fixing and some improvements.

Microsoft manager talked about the true cost of Eclipse, the popular “free” java IDE. His estimation was 100K per seat which I think is somewhat overblown. It still underscores an important truth.

There is a high cost factor associated with most open source software which includes (but not limited to) adapting and improving often poor quality product, understanding and documenting often poorly documented products, cost of support, maintenance, cost of security audit etc.

In the end, with few notable exceptions (both in open source and paid software), you get what you pay for.

Discussion

peter hanula
July 31, 2007: 7:53 pm

“Microsoft manager talked about the true cost of Eclipse, the popular “free” java IDE. His estimation was 100K per seat which I think is somewhat overblown. It still underscores an important truth.”

citing from liked article (omitted parts don’t change the meaning i just didn’t want copy it all):

“When he added it up, the cost of using VS 2005 was over $30,000 versus more than $100,000 for Eclipse-based applications.
….
Get over it Microsoft!
….
I have used it successfully for many years. Today Eclipse is a truly polished product and gives any IDE (free or costly or outrageously costly like Visual Studio) a run for its money.
….”

well … what to say …
“‘Anyone who has never made a mistake has never tried anything new.’ - Albert Einstein”

:-D

March 16, 2007: 11:55 pm

Yep.

most of the time while using opensource softwares
documentation and support is the first problem, one will have to spend for it

sudhir

February 15, 2006: 9:43 pm

> Doing research will help clarify those considerations.

Consider choosing a CMS. It has over 100 OSS implementations. Don’t you think at some point the cost of research tips (especially with poorly documented projects) the cost of purchasing a known high quality software? I have had that experience quite a number of times.

February 15, 2006: 9:04 pm

I suppose some people pick open source software because it is free, but some of us prefer it because of the community of support that gathers around the best software.

Open source is only a liability when the quality is low and/or community support is low. Doing research will help clarify those considerations.

February 13, 2006: 2:02 am

[...] Angsuman discussed “The Open Source Trap”. [...]

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :