Reverse engineering Google thought process in developing Google Web Accelerator
By Angsuman Chakraborty, Gaea News NetworkWednesday, May 11, 2005
What was Google think-tank smoking when they developed GWA?
They developed a product which provides further speed to already very fast users ( in Bengali we say it is akin to applying oil on a well oiled head ), doesn’t anonymize (anonymization adds value to a proxy) well, over-optimized without concern for destroying web analytics, loading web servers or breaking web applications etc.
Lets reverse engineer the thought process that went behind closed doors by the famed think tank (lets not forget the Phd’s) in Google. A “thought experiment” as Professor Einstein would say.
I think the key meeting went something like this:
Big Boss: We need to capture users detailed surfing habits, everything they do, when they do etc. Lab demands it for targeted search, advertising and other ideas (hush hush).
Architect Phd: As we cannot install a Trojan, being “do no evil” [smirk] and all… the only way I can see is to route all their traffic through our proxy. We provide them a free proxy service, maybe some anonymity.
Marketing: Only pseudo-anonymity. Anonymity makes bad press. At least provide a way for eager webmasters to find out the actual users.
Sales: What does it buy them? Why would they use it?
Architect Phd: Umm… faster speed of web access. We can provide faster speed to dialup modem users by compressing data, caching get requests, pre-fetching (interrupted by marketing as it was going way over his head)
Marketing: No way. Dialup constitutes a declining segment of the market. It wouldn’t go well with our investors. Google should target the emerging and rapidly growing sector, broadband users. Why don’t you make it faster for broadband users?
Architect: But they are already way too fast…
May 12, 2005: 10:35 pm
Your point being? Are you saying I cannot use Google AdSense because Google has made a stupid decision wrt. Web Accelerator? And finally are you threatening me? At this point I have decent click-through rate. Your comment on my clicks seems very suspicious. Your English is wrong and it can be corrected in two ways. I answered to 2 above. However in either interpretation it appears you are a Google employee who can somehow manipulate my clicks. It would be very very interesting if that is so. I am sure lots of people would love to hear about your exploits. You also seem very sensitive to the issue which again makes me suspicious about your corporate affiliation. I would suggest you grow up and get a life. No company, however great in your eyes, can subsitute for life. |
Blog |
angsuman