Web 2.0 - Next Generation Internet or Hype?

By Angsuman Chakraborty, Gaea News Network
Tuesday, October 11, 2005

Everyone today is talking about Web 2.0. In the post-dotcom era several concepts were re-defined, old ideas re-emerged with new variations. Does that make it Web 2.0 or is it yet another faux-meme and marketing hype? Let’s explore…

O’Reilly roughly defines Web 2.0 with the following transformations:

Web 1.0   Web 2.0
DoubleClick –> Google AdSense
Ofoto –> Flickr
Akamai –> BitTorrent
mp3.com –> Napster
Britannica Online –> Wikipedia
personal websites –> blogging
evite –> upcoming.org and EVDB
domain name speculation –> search engine optimization
page views –> cost per click
screen scraping –> web services
publishing –> participation
content management systems –> wikis
directories (taxonomy) –> tagging (”folksonomy”)
stickiness –> syndication
ms word –> writely
ms excel –> numsum

We can disagree with some of these items. For example I don’t think tagging is really a replacement for taxonomy (directories). Tagging is yet another hype, soon to be replaced. Search coupled with tagging may however be a value-added replacement of directory systems.

However by and large I too agree that a transformation is indeed taking shape. Web companies are becoming more matured with time as market realities becomes clearly defined. It is moving towards the age of services. And Web is steadily and surely moving towards replacing the desktop as a service provider platform. Operating System providers like Microsoft and Linux are becoming less relevant.

O’Reily article provides an interesting meme-map of the transformation:
Web 2.0

I disagree with the meme-map on several points. It is surely a work in progress. However some of the items stand out as uncannily accurate like the long-tail, perpetual beta etc.

Overall today software services are much more consumer-centric than ever before. You trust the user, perpetually improve the product and work closley with your customers to achieve success. Blogging has supplemented traditional customer relationship management. Common users has much greater say in shaping today’s software and services.

Most of these changes were gradual and now some of them are firmly re-defining the existing way of doing business. Does that make a Web 2.0? I think the changes define not just the internet but the entire software industry. I would rather call these changes collectively as Software Industry 2.0.

What do you think?

Discussion
February 24, 2006: 4:42 am

[...] Spreadsheet - NumSum, [...]

December 2, 2005: 12:15 pm

[...] I was talking before about Web 2.0 services and gave examples of some high quality free Web 2.0 services. With a sad heart I nominate both Bloglet and FeedBlitz for Web -2.0 service (dis)honor. [...]

October 17, 2005: 1:05 am

[...] Bryan discovers a new web-based to-do list service. Michael reports that Invader, Binary Bonsai’s complex re-design, has hit the 35% mark. Khaled briefly discusses Flock, “a new browser that?s intended for bloggers.” Jon reviews the Motorola ROKR E1 (the first “iTunes Phone”). Craig is happy to be a 38. Chris publishes a tutorial on how to use PHP to make variables in CSS. Angsuman ruminates on Web 2.0. Mark learns how to set Firefox to recognize horizontal scrolling. And, Tom learns how to watch DVDs on a new video iPod. [...]

YOUR VIEW POINT
NAME : (REQUIRED)
MAIL : (REQUIRED)
will not be displayed
WEBSITE : (OPTIONAL)
YOUR
COMMENT :